Saturday, April 14, 2012

The Home Run King*



762 career home runs, over 2500 career walks, nearly 3000 career hits, and 514 career stolen bases. You could probably take any two of these four statistics and argue that a player with those numbers is a first ballot Hall of Famer. Barry Bonds has all of these numbers and more. The two numbers that stand out in particular are his all-time records 762 career home runs and 73 home runs in 2001.

Every time he stepped in the batter’s box, everybody held their breath waiting for something only this freak of nature could do. As a result, he was given intentional walks at an unfathomable rate. His career total for free passes, 688, was more than the next two on the list (Hank Aaron and Willie McCovey) combined. Someone may never reach these numbers again. No hitter has ever been feared more than Barry Bonds.

We can’t put these numbers solely to the incredible talent and work ethic of Bonds. He transformed from a base-stealing, power hitting, all-around threat to a purely lethal home run hitter, something very unusual. Although never convicted, in the midst of the infamous steroid era, Bonds stolen base totals began to decrease dramatically. Prior to 1999, he had averaged 34 stolen bases a year. In 1999, he had 15 stolen bases and averaged less than 8 stolen bases a year for the rest of his career. He was losing his speed fast, and trading it for bulk.

Miraculously, the 14-time All-Star saw an increase in home run totals, peaking at age 37 in 2001 with the 73 home runs, an age where most players consider retiring. That’s not the only thing that increased during this time. Compare his head size as a rookie in 1986 to that in 2001. Bonds head grew in size from 7 1/8 to 7 3/4 and his shoe size grew from 10 1/2 to size 13. These numbers are as inhumane as his baseball statistics, and there is a correlation, namely anabolic steroids.

After all, Bonds himself admitted that he took steroids.

Bonds undoubtedly felt pressure from the home run hitters around him. McGwire and Sosa, the other premiere home run hitters of the steroid era both cheated the game. McGwire eventually admitted to steroid use and Sosa tested positive in 2003. Both players passed Roger Maris’ home run record multiple times each from 1998 to 2001. What was the response of an extremely competitive Barry Bonds? An impossible 300 home runs after the age of 35 speaks for itself.

As a Bay Area native and lifelong Giants fan, Barry Bonds was and is my baseball hero. Hearing Duane Kuiper bellowing home run calls day after day during baseball season is something I will never forget. Kuiper’s home run call when Bonds passed Hank Aaron is as good as it gets—words cannot describe the emotions that are attached to what we know simply as 756. Listen for yourself – there are few things in the entire sports world quite like this moment. And as a Giants fan, this moment embodied the epitome of pride in our sports hero.

Now fast forward to 2012. One year from Bonds eligibility for the Hall of Fame. The divide in support and for Bonds is complex and not even all Giants fans support Bonds’ induction. If I saw him inducted into the Hall, I would be excited. One of the best players of my generation, no less a man who had been my favorite player on my favorite team…how could I not be excited? But as a baseball fan, the asterisk that taints his record would still give me a twisting sensation. He cheated…so is it right to give him recognition along with legends like Hank Aaron and Babe Ruth?

If I were a sports writer who voted for Hall of Famers, I would not vote for Barry Bonds induction. In response to the final question of the previous paragraph, he does not deserve recognition alongside Aaron, Ruth, Mays, Robinson, Cobb, and the like. You can’t look at his numbers prior to 2000 (roughly when he began using performance enhancing drugs) and argue that they are Hall of Fame numbers, thus he should be inducted. You can’t choose part of his careers body of work and ignore the subsequent and most famous accomplishments. He is known for 73 and 762, not for being the skinny base stealer on the Pirates.

So finally we arrive at the strongest argument for Barry Bonds induction: Major League Baseball did not implement required steroid testing until June 2004, and Bonds never failed a drug test (including the one Sosa failed in 2003). Technically speaking, Bonds never “broke the law” of Major League Baseball like, for example, Pete Rose did when Rose bet on baseball and was sentenced to a lifetime ban from baseball. However, in 1991, before the “steroid era,” MLB Commissioner Ray Vincent “sent a memo to each team announcing that steroids have been added to the league’s banned list.” And in April 2001, baseball implemented a random testing program and a penalty for steroid use at the minor league level. Why wasn’t this implemented at the Major League level? Commissioner Bud Selig had no reason to stop the home run records that were being broken left and right at an inhuman rate. Everybody loves home runs, so Selig took the easy way out and turned a blind eye to something that was right in front of his face. Players like Barry Bonds took advantage of the system. They artificially increased their power and home run capabilities. But the artificial capabilities in combination with the fact that steroids were on the banned list for baseball means Bonds should not be immortalized in Cooperstown.

Most importantly, inducting Bonds sets precedence for future inductees. If Bonds is elected a member of the Hall, so should the other steroid era greats like Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, Roger Clemens, and Alex Rodriguez. The Hall of Fame will become as tainted as the home run records Bonds holds. Baseball does not want that. As America’s pastime, we need to keep the Hall of Fame baseball’s sacred ground.

21 comments:

  1. I respect the fact that Bonds was your hero growing up, and you're still willing to admit that his steroid use should not earn him a Hall of Fame induction. Props to you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. roids are roids, cheating is cheating. i agree that he should not be voted into the hall of fame. and neither should clemes, mcgwire, sosa, or a-rod.

    ReplyDelete
  3. so anyone that played in that 30 year era can not go to the HOF. Roger CLemens included. Oh and Barry never took Steroids, he took Human Growth Hormone which wasn't illegal until 2004 i think.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ever heard of Greenies? Or how about it's liquid cousin Red Juice? Both banned substances used by players to increase performance. All "cheaters" are out right? Okay, sorry Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Mickey Mantle, and others from the 60s and 70s. Also, Babe Ruth suspiciously hit 60% of his home runs after the age of 30, where most people should be declining Ruth was increasing his HR total.

    Here's my take. Steroids increases your ability to lift more weight off the field, allowing you to hit the ball farther and/or throw the ball harder. Does it increase hand eye coordination? No. How about eyesight? Nope. A player MUST have raw abilities that are of those of a superstar in the first place to ever benefit from "PEDs". Bonds is a HOF with or without steroids. He would have hit 600 regardless. Clemens is a HOF in my opinion too. McGwire hit 49 HR his rookie season, when he was a skinny 23 year old. My point is this. Without steroids all 3 would be 1st ballot HOF with the exception of maybe McGwire.

    Furthermore. Cooperstown's purpose is to tell the story of baseball, the good and the bad. Erasing the Steroid Era from Cooperstown would be like America rewriting the History books to omit slavery or the Japanese interment camps. You cannot pretend like hings never happened.

    Finally, Bob Costas offered a solution that I love. He said to put an asterisk in the front of the record books that would read (and I am paraphrasing) "Throughout the history of Baseball many products were used to gain a competitive edge, most notably, but not exclusively, the Steroid Era. MLB neglected to keep the playing field even and is unsure about who used what to gain an advantage. Take each record and player with the knowledge that it is impossible to know who gained an unfair advantage and who didn't.

    My two cents...

    ReplyDelete
  5. First Ballot Hall of Famer! Shouldn't be any question about it. He had HOF numbers far before he touched PEDs.

    You can't look at him as the Home Run King only. Put that aside and he's still first ballot. He did a helluva lot more than that for the Giants and Pirates, I'll tell you that much. 500-500 and all those gold gloves should be what ties the bow on it!

    http://giantsbaseballblog.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  6. What if he didn't actually do roids? I know it's almost certain he did, but what if he didn't? The HOF would be tainting the best home run hitter in history. Just sayin' the hypothetical. Because there is no proof, he should be in the HOF, First Ballot!

    ReplyDelete
  7. "He transformed from a base-stealing, power hitting, all-around threat to a purely lethal home run hitter." So while I agree that he has never been proven to have taken steroids, it's pretty obvious that he has. This is coming from a huge Bonds fan, too... I think his greatness best be kept out of Cooperstown otherwise a flood of other home run hitting machines like McGwire should be let in, too. Don't you agree that that's what would happen if Bonds was let in?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Also he admitted himself to "unknowingly" taking steroids.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jones Lang La - Salle Inc began marketing the loans a few
    weeks ago, attracting over 100 your clients short term loans you can either please take a secured quick loan
    or even an unsecured quick loan.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It could be beneficial if you're aware from the rules of payment and adhere to them religiously http://paydayloans364.co.uk if your ratio is a lot more than 35%, they probably won't extend you credit.

    ReplyDelete
  11. One with the things that we do spend a good volume of time with the clients base on could be
    the structure payday loan lenders just an easy
    form to be packed up and the processing starts therein.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Applying online helps you save valuable some time and permit
    that you avail the cash money, without the need to spend any extra fee online payday loans what better way to know
    exactly what kind of car you need being looking
    for than using your loan decision already in your
    pocket.

    ReplyDelete
  13. These short-term cash loans are easily obtainable in a quick amount of
    time, and lenders provide the cash requested without much of
    an hassle payday loans online
    if you will find that you must sign up for a loan, make sure to take out only what it
    is possible to payback.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You just need to offer require information about yourself like UK
    citizenship, age proof, employment details, bank proof and residence proof so on online loans fast many people use a
    lot more than one pay day loan business on the same time, which worsens the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Do you may need extra funds and hesitating to make use of for any loan plan
    just as a result of your low credit score record quick payday loan it's vital to consider that they're still for emergency purposes only, in case
    you will need one your best option for getting the first is online.

    ReplyDelete
  16. If you apply for credit again in the hour your
    credit history could possibly be different, according to him,
    referring for the inquiry that would happen to be generated when the first lender accessed my credit information payday loans no credit checks today, while
    investigating federalism that unites, the jvp needs to clarify for the
    rest from the sri lankan polity and society just what it means with the new terminology and exactly what it
    does not mean or imply.

    ReplyDelete
  17. ninety day payday advances are offered to you in order that you just are prepared for expenses
    like settling of debts, payment of awaiting bills,
    repairing your vehicle and many more guarantor loans in fact,
    without having credit assessment program available, you
    happen to be likely to qualify despite having new credit.

    ReplyDelete
  18. To auto loan agencies it might normally show a a bad
    credit score worthiness of your person payday loan bad credit you
    won't have to waste much of your respective precious time in just making enquiries when an unexpected emergency pops up.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Certainly, it can be beneficial to call home inside your means, avoiding comparisons with other people, and cultivating a sense of gratitude for
    which you have, rather than longing for what you
    don't Best Pay Day Loans Online i guess i wouldn't mind should they were accusing an unspecified
    number of carpet cleaners being no good, nevertheless they made a decision to accuse everybody.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Very good info. Lucky me I recently found your site by chance (stumbleupon).
    I have saved it for later!http://monkeypoundstillpayday.
    co.uk

    ReplyDelete

Add your thoughts or opinion.